 |

 |
cleolinda | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Bluebell's Triple Chocolate ice cream is the food of the frickin' gods. It's two kinds of chocolate ice cream (Dutch and milk, I think?), a meager swirl of vanilla (just for variety; they're not cheating you out of your chocolate), and a thick vein of sundae sauce. You put a bowl of it in the microwave for twenty seconds, and fnnnaghhhhhhhh. I just thought you should know. Reread Dracula over the last couple of days. You know, as much as I love that book--I have the illustrated Greg Hildebrandt hardback, the one I was obsessed with when I was thirteen--I don't know that I've ever read it cover to cover before, without skimming at all (which is how you know my medication's finally adjusting, too--that I can even read again). I think what happens is that the Jonathan Harker chapters at the beginning start off pretty well, but halfway through those Stoker just gets so incredibly bogged down in the physical details of the castle and Harker running around trying to escape, and I start to lose consciousness. It gets better after that, though--maybe I'm just older now and feel more interest in things that lost me when I was thirteen, like furniture shopping. It's a lot easier to read about the characters, essentially, researching. Actually, I find that fascinating now--I was always struck by the way Stoker essentially wrote a multimedia novel (letters, memoranda, telegrams, newspaper articles, phonograph transcripts) a hundred years before people really started to get into that kind of thing. I mean, it's not just an epistolary novel: he actually takes advantage of (describing) a variety of different technologies and viewpoints, and someday, someone is going to get the bright idea to reissue the novel as a multimedia CD-rom of some kind. I think this must have, in part, inspired the way I did the Black Ribbon website without my even realizing it. But what really struck me, for the first time consciously, was the way that the book is essentially about research. The actual running-around action parts are buried through a thick layer of "I collated his letters" and "I typed up his diary" and "she transcribed my recordings." And Stoker actually manages to make it interesting, or at least it's interesting to me now that I'm in my late twenties--this idea of people struggling to conquer a mass of documentation. The other thing that struck me was--well, I don't know if you've read any criticism on Dracula, but even the most cursory Halloween special on A&E will talk about how misogynist some of the imagery is. Women are punished for being penetrated (by fangs) and for any sign of sexual desire. A woman who is assaulted against her will is viewed as hopelessly tainted. The heroine is religious, chaste and pure; the three "brides" are lascivious and obscene. The vampires are destroyed by being re-penetrated "correctly," by the phallic stake of the patriarchy. And so on, etc. Here's my question: how does that view of the book explain this? - A Lucy letter: "Why can't they let a girl marry three men, or as many as want her, and save all this trouble? But this is heresy, and I must not say it."
- Seward's diary: "When it was all over, we were standing beside Arthur, who, poor fellow, was speaking of his part in the operation where his blood had been transfused to his Lucy's veins. I could see Van Helsing's face grow white and purple by turns. Arthur was saying that he felt since then as if they two had been really married, and that she was his wife in the sight of God. None of us said a word of the other operations, and none of us ever shall." Which is to say, Lucy has received "the blood of four strong men" in the course of her illness.
- Van Helsing: "For why should I give myself so much labor and so much of sorrow? I have come here from my own land to do what I can of good, at the first to please my friend John, and then to help a sweet young lady, whom too, I come to love."
- Jonathan Harker: ""Dr. Van Helsing, you love Mina, I know. Oh, do something to save her. It cannot have gone too far yet. Guard her while I look for him!"
- Van Helsing again: "And oh, Madam Mina, my dear, my dear, may we who love you be there to see, when that red scar, the sign of God's knowledge of what has been, shall pass away, and leave your forehead as pure as the heart we know."
I think the book does separate out carnal desire (the vampires) from chaste love (what the various men feel for Mina, uncomplicated by any desire to marry her. I mean, other than Jonathan). And you can argue that this in and of itself is some kind of sexist madonna/whore complex, or that women are only valued on pedestals, or whatever. But I really do think there is a strong element of respect and esteem for Mina, her courage, her intelligence. Not only that, but she--and while she is alive, Lucy as well--commands the love of multiple men, and while I'm sure this is meant to be a pure and chaste love for many of them, the language is the same as that of romantic love. They manage not to say "I love you" directly to Mina, but they frequently say "we love her," the same as they say "we loved Lucy," and this is from men who wanted to marry Lucy. And this isn't even touching on that polygamist subtext, where a woman could marry "as many as want her," and three different men do say "I love you," and she ends up "married in the sight of God" to four different men. I'm just saying, where female sexuality is thwarted in one direction, it seems to have a surprising, if indirect, expression in another. To an extent, yes, this female-centric view is dulled by some hidebound Victorian ideas about women: Mina has "man's brain and woman's heart," which is a lovely compliment until you stop and think about it; their need to keep her out of their plans towards the end if only because she is an actual liability now that Dracula can possibly read her mind is combined with a belief earlier in the book that all this fighting the evil undead is just too horrible for a woman to be involved. But time and time again they talk about how wonderful and clever and hard-working she is; she takes the minutes at their meetings, types up journals and transcripts, contributes valuable information through her own diaries, and keeps the train timetables memorized. Towards the end, it's Mina who actually sits down with her diary and logics out by what means Dracula must be making the final leg of his journey, and they praise her for it. She is treated as an invaluable member of the team, and they regret the moment when she has to withdraw because she, by no fault of her own or her sex, has become a liability. What I'm saying is, you can point to how this is some kind of statement about how the ideal Victorian woman should be chaste and forbearing and religious (there is a whole lot of weepin' and prayin', as the professor I had who taught the Sentimental Novel course would say), but Stoker throws a completely novel element into that mix--the ideal woman in his book is intelligent, capable, brave, and equal (and at times superior!) to the men in her logical abilities. You see the Woman as Moral Superior thing all the time--but how often do you see, in Victorian literature, Woman as Intellectual Equal? And not only that, but the men love her and devote themselves to her for it. The gender dynamic is pretty complex, is what I'm saying, and Stoker's portrayal of Mina in particular has a lot of feminist value. Anyhoo. I've been going through Literary Gothic, your friend and mine, for all my old Gothic lit links--not because I didn't save a lot of texts to my hard drive (I did), but because I have so many that I can't remember what they're all about, or which ones are worth reading first. So, as I go back through a lot of them, I'm going to post a link or two each day, to ration them out rather than overwhelm y'all with dozens at once. First of all: particle_person has a new story transcribed at talesfromthefen. Today's author: Jerome K. Jerome. I love him so much. "The Dancing Partner." I absolutely love this one. "The Man of Science." I love the last paragraph, for some reason. Told After Supper. A longer collection of... basically, four or five ghost story parodies, linked by about four or five bowls of whiskey punch. Choice quotes: "The Governor suggested palming off some other Emily's grave upon the poor thing, but, as luck would have it, there did not seem to have been an Emily of any sort buried anywhere for miles round. I never came across a neighbourhood so utterly destitute of dead Emilies." "One night he went to bed. There was nothing very extraordinary about that, I admit. He often did go to bed of a night." "I do not, however, believe I am doing his memory an injustice in believing that he was not entirely unconnected with the death, and subsequent burial, of a gentleman who used to play the harp with his toes." "I asked [the ghost] what tobacco he used, and he replied, 'The ghost of cut cavendish, as a rule.' " "How do you manage when there isn't any cock handy?" Enjoy. October: Domestic Violence Awareness MonthTags: book discussion, books, dracula, gothic, halloween, ice cream, lit crit
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
Comments
Page 1 of 2 [1] [2]
|
 |
 |
















 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
That was really interesting to read. I studied Dracula for A Level English Lit, as a comparison text to The Picture of Dorien Gray. We were encouraged to discover and debate as many different ideas in the book(s) as we could - love, madness, fin de siecle 'paranois' of sorts - the ways in which the world was changing at the turn of the century; foreign travel, science versus religion, new technologies and new ways of living. While the subject of misogyny always comes up (especially if you have a female teacher!) I think we reached very much the same conclusions that you did - the role of women was starting to change (or expand) towards the turn of the century, and I think maybe Stoker is taking into account the way a lot of people feared this change and attempted to stop it going any further (the number of men who campaigned against women's right to vote, etc) through the persecution of Mina - a woman who is enbracing new technology and living a more 'modern' sort of existance - by Dracula, who represents a more archaic order (women being repressed and punished by penetration, etc).
Ooh, Helen would have been so proud! At least I didn't learn all of that for nothing!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |


 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Perchance have you read Anno Dracula, by Kim Newman? It's a sort of alternate universe story where Dracula wasn't defeated. As a result of his actions, vampires are "outed." The really fun part of Anno Dracula consists of all the cameo appearances of fictional characters and real people from the period... Florence Stoker, Arthur Holmwood, Mina Harker, Oscar Wilde, Basil Hallward, Lord Ruthven, Graf Orlock, John Merrick, Mycroft Holmes, Fu Manchu, and the like (including one character Stoker created for Dracula but never used: Kate Reed, a lady journalist who becomes a vampire. There's three novels in the Anno Dracula series, and Newman has enough material for a fourth. The Bloody Red Baron (the second book) is probably my favorite, with its focus on First World War aerial combat... and a bit where Manfred von Richthofen finally kills one of his more tenacious enemies. The third book, Judgement of Tears (aka Dracula Cha Cha Cha) is pretty fun, set in Rome in 1959, featuring a vampire James Bond, Orson Welles on the set of a Jason and the Argonauts film directed by Fritz Lang and starring Kirk Douglas.
Thing is, I'm not even really into vampire fiction all that much (I read Dracula, I Am Legend, the aforementioned Anno Dracula, and Lost Souls, but that's it)... but I like Kim Newman's writing a lot. It puzzles me that he doesn't sell very well over here (he's a friend and contemporary of Neil Gaiman, for corn's sake), because he's really good at what he does. I've had to browse used bookshops to find the Anno Dracula books, for the most part. Either that or look around at a con, or maybe Alibris...
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |


 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In addition to the interesting observations you and some of the other posters have made about Dracula, I'm fascinated at how Lucy and Mina can be viewed as examples of old school gothic heroine vs. "modern" (by Victorian standards) gothic heroine.
Lucy is the kind of heroine you would have seen in the early gothic novels of the 1700/1800s -- you know the type: beautiful, noble, romantic, naive, kind, adored by everyone and everything, and completely ineffectual against the forces of evil around her. I've joked before that she's such a girly teenager sort that you can practically see the hearts over her Is in her journal sections. (and despite what Francis Ford Coppola and James Hart think, not a complete whorebitch trampslut who would have been shoved in a sanitarium faster than you can say "nymphomaniac".)
Mina, on the other hand, is the "new" sort of gothic heroine. She's a working girl of a middle class background, and already married to an equally middle class goober. As you guys have noted, though, she is smart and observant and a calming presence and helps Our Heroes win the day through research and knowledge of mundane things like the daily train schedule, and is put into peril only when Our Heroes decide she is too delicate for some vampire hunting action because she's a giirrrrl. She's perceived as so strong that she is not lured into vampirism like Lucy, but forced into it (isn't she likened to a kitten having its head dunked into a saucer to make it drink?). True, she doesn't perform any great feats, either, but she actually takes some action to try and save her friends, and later herself. She's a great character, and I wish someday that a movie adaptation could properly represent this smart, steady woman in a role other than Love Interest/Midnight Snack.
(Also, I just have to say that Van Helsing's admiration of Mina is not just a little creepy. It's not overtly sexual, of course, it's just that he goes into raptures whenever she speaks or others speak of her, over and over, to the point where I think "Jesus, Abe, you know she's already married, right?")
...and now I'm going to move on, because I could analyze this book all night.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |


 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
I think whimsy is a good word for it. But I'm torn, because part of me has always liked the idea of bringing whimsy (back? Did they ever have it?) to academia, and part of me wants to run screaming. I seriously never, ever want to write a paper again, which is kind of bad because I think I do have one more 600-level seminar before I get my MFA. Research seems to appeal to me only if no one's actually making me do it for a grade (or a scholarly publication, I suppose).
Here's the best part: I have never, at any point, majored in English literature. I was a Spanish major/French minor, and even now my MFA is in creative writing. It's just that, at the university where I'm grad studenting, the creative writing degree has a whoooooole lot of lit requirements. I got all my workshops out of the way early and have been in lit classes ever since. Which has been nice, because while I was at a liberal arts undergrad where I did take some good (English) lit courses, I think took Brit survey and Dante. I did have an extremely good teacher I got both my freshman and senior year in high school, though.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|  |
 |

|
 |
|
 |