Occupation: Girl

Please close the door and switch on the fun without fail.

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
My thoughts on Twilight, let me show you them
twilight
cleolinda
So... I finally read an e-book of Twilight last night, and... I kind of love it like cake. With rainbow sparkles sprinkles. Carried in by ponies. Pink ponies. If I had a hard copy, I would snuggle it. I'm going to read the other two, but they'll have to wait until I reread the first one again. Note: I also own and have seen Van Helsing about fifteen times, so... my loving something is not necessarily the most ringing endorsement in the world. I'm just saying.

So, in a nutshell, here's what the book is about: Bella's an angsty teen girl in a new town, and Edward's a sparkly vampire. No, really:
Edward in the sunlight was shocking. I couldn't get used to it, though I'd been staring at him all afternoon. His skin, white despite the faint flush from yesterday's hunting trip, literally sparkled, like thousands of tiny diamonds were embedded in the surface. He lay perfectly still in the grass, his shirt open over his sculpted, incandescent chest, his scintillating arms bare. His glistening, pale lavender lids were shut, though of course he didn't sleep. A perfect statue, carved in some unknown stone, smooth like marble, glittering like crystal.
Also, vampire baseball.

A lot of people are really passionate about these books. Some of them love and defend them passionately; others... well. I'm not going to defend them any more than I'm going to defend Twinkies--you go and get yourself a Twinkie when you have a very specific kind of craving SUGARRRRR!. If you want gourmet pastry, or even a homemade cake, you know where to get that. If you're eating a Twinkie, you clearly know what you want and why you're eating it, and you know that it's not good to eat very many of them, but... you know... sometimes you just want one. And then when you're done you read it all over again. Apparently there are people who think that Twinkies count as fine dining, but... well, live and let live, I guess.

But I do have three theories as to why the books are so popular, and they all complement each other--that is to say, I think they're all working simultaneously:

1) "Vampire" is a metaphor for "teenage boy": I know that it's women who are supposed to be the mysterious sex--"What do women want?" and all that--but I personally found boys to be just as enigmatic when I was a teenager. I mean, yes, boys want sex. But it's not as easy as that--okay, you're a teenage girl, you give in, now you're the school slut, or the thrill is gone and he moves on because you're both, you know, teenagers and probably not ready yet. The real question on a girl's mind is, "What, other than sex, is he thinking about? What, other than sex, do I have to offer someone I'm crazy about?" And if you're a teenage girl with low self-esteem, the answer you're going to come up with to that second question is going to be, "I don't have anything, because I'm not pretty or special or worthy, so if I don't want to immediately put out, I have nothing, and I have no chance." The obvious answer being "sex" actually makes it harder, because you've got that looming in front of you, and maybe a kind of despair--are you going to have to give in if you want a boy to like you? What if you aren't ready? What if you're scared?

Enter Edward Cullen and his bizarro moodswings. Edward is everything that is confusing about the opposite sex writ large; I find it particularly telling that his first encounter with Bella makes her think that he hates her. The entire buildup to their first kiss is this love/hate push-pull of trying to figure out what he's thinking, and it turns out the whole time he was trying to figure out what she was thinking. So, having established that all along they were both crazy about each other the whole time (and wouldn't it be nice if that was really the key to the mystery of the sexes?), Edward and Bella then settle down to wrestle with their various "hungers." But Edward struggles manfully with both his hungers and hers--he's always the one to pull away when either he or Bella goes too far. Consider, also, that young girls tend to gravitate towards "safe," often semi-androgynous celebrities at this age (cough*Hanson*cough) because they're less threatening to a girl's developing sexuality. Sex is possible, and a forbidden thrill to contemplate, but it's not a danger: you're safe with Edward, because he loves you just that much, and he's never going to pressure you because he wants to protect you from himself.

2) Girls like bad boys: Believe it or not, this is actually tied to Point #1. I've held this as a general theory for a while, so listen up, nice guys (or Nice Guys), but maybe not for the reason you'd think. I actually don't think girls like a guy who treats them bad. But I do think they--we--get off a little on the idea of changing someone for the better, or the idea of having the power that someone loves us so much that he'll change or sacrifice something for us. (I don't have the patience for fixer-uppers in real life--if I'm going to be with you, I want you to be a fully formed, fully actualized self before I get there--but I'm a sucker for the trope in literature.) A nice guy doesn't need to change, and, most importantly, he's already nice to everyone. How do you know that you're special if he treats everyone else with as much kindness and respect as he treats you? The "bad boy" type, though? He may range from simple, garden-variety jackhole (hello, Sawyer!) to appalling psychopath (hello, Dr. Lecter!), but you know he loves you because he's completely different around you. You are an exception to his very nature. This is how "villain" ends up drifting towards "antihero"--Dracula, the Phantom of the Opera, Spike on Buffy, fanfic!Draco Malfoy--but you even see it with straightforward heroes: Mr. Darcy and Mr. Rochester are both cold, prickly, withdrawn types until Lizzie Bennet and Jane Eyre arrive, respectively, to bewilder and melt them. That's the fantasy. (Note: this is not a comparison of quality.)

Now, the problem is that, in real life, tigers rarely change their stripes. Sure, your jerk of choice may start out giving you the special treatment, but as the novelty of the relationship wears off, he's going to do exactly what the nice guy does: he's going to treat you just like he treats everyone else. Except that with the jerk, this is exactly where you don't want to be. But you'll remember the good times long after you're getting the full jackass treatment--you've just got to try to change him harder, right? (Ugh.)

So, the theory in regards to Twilight: Edward spends at least half the book struggling rather violently with himself not to ravage Bella, "his brand of heroin." And the harder he has to struggle, the more attractive he is to the reader, because that's just how much he loves Bella. And Bella is essentially the reader's proxy. So you have this guy who--we are reminded endlessly--is an Adonis on earth, and if you were anyone else, anyone not adorably clumsy and secretly hot and smelling naturally of freesia, you would be toast. But you're special.

3) Wish fulfillment: I really cannot stress how important this element is, because I think it's also the reason that Harry Potter grabbed the cultural imagination. You're not a neglected orphan sleeping in a cupboard! You're a wizard! You're the bestest wizard of all and you're also great at sports and you had rich, wizardly parents who loved you so much they died for you (but you've still got their money) and also, we brought you birthday cake! And then you, through Harry, are plunged into this fantastically detailed wizard world. I mean, shit, I'm sold. And I think most things that really grab people are going to tap that "I want to be that person and live in that world" vein. I want to be Elizabeth Swann, I want to be Lyra Belacqua, I want to be the Pevensie kids. (I don't know that Lord of the Rings is wish fulfillment precisely, but Tolkien very cannily positions both Bilbo and Frodo as the reader's proxy--the mundane, home-loving hobbit suddenly swept into a crazy world of wizards and legends and adventure. And you know, Frodo's long trek through Mordor is hardly the stuff of wish fulfillment, but then, that's always the section where I start to get restless. So there may be something to the theory, even there.)

So with Twilight, Bella leaves her flaky, remarried mother to move to a new town and a new school with her silent-type small-town police chief father. She immediately takes up several pages telling us how she doesn't fit in anywhere and she's not like other people and no one understands her (which is actually pretty standard for a teenage girl. I for one started having strong whiny flashbacks to age fourteen. Reader proxy ahoy!). Also, she's so clumsy that she literally cannot walk through a door without falling down. So she moves to Forks, where the boys immediately fall over themselves to walk her to class, and end up lining up to ask her to the spring dance. But she doesn't want them--no, she wants the moody, angelically gorgeous Edward, despite the fact that he's kind of a cranky bastard for the first quarter of the book. (But see, the "cranky bastard" part ends up adding to the allure, because then Bella Is So Special That She Changes Him--see Point #2 above.) And so not only does Edward end up falling for her from (we find out) first sight, but he then demonstrates the outrageous depths of his love and passion in fighting his very nature for her sake (again, Point #2), and then he takes her home to his vampire family, with his beautiful and loving and rich "parents" who immediately accept Bella and thank her for "changing" Edward. No, I'm serious, they actually thank her for the change she hath wrought in him. Because in nearly a hundred years, you see, he's never loved anyone. But you Bella, she of the delicious freesia scent and the life-threatening clumsiness, has cured his loneliness. And also, you she now has a loving vampire family--I submit that the scene where she goes to meet the Cullens is wish-fulfillment just in itself for anyone who has ever contemplated the terror of meeting one's prospective in-laws.

I'm not saying the books don't have many, many problems. For one, they're a little too nakedly about that wish fulfillment--there is pretty much no plot for the first two-thirds, maybe even three-quarters of the book except "Omg why does he hate me? Why does he not hate me now? Why does he hate me again? Does he like me? Does he not like me? Does he like me again? Omg I love him I love him I love him I love him I love him I love him he loves me!! And he sparkles!" When the plot does show up, it's "Omg this other vampire wants to kill me! But Edward loves me! And his vampire family loves me! But now I have to sacrifice myself to save the people that I love! But they all still come to save me! And then we go to prom." (Also: "I thought your vampire sister dressed me up so that you could turn me, what do you mean we're going to prom?! " Bella, honey, they don't hand out corsages for death.) The focus is so narrow that it's almost claustrophobic. And then--well, let's count some, some of the problems that I have:

1) Screw you, Mom and Dad! I wanna die and be a vampire!

2) ... Before I get old and wrinkly, ew!

3) I know that parents seem to dig these books because of the abstinence message (see Big Paragraph Point #1), but... does the teen death theme not bother them at all? And speaking of lessons for the younger readers:

4) It's totes okay for a guy to stalk you and watch you while you sleep so long as he's hot.

5) Considering that Bella's mom is her "best friend," Bella sure doesn't act like it. And I'm speaking as someone whose mother is her best friend. In fact, all of Bella's non-vampire relationships are extremely perfunctory. She barely tolerates her female friends, and...

6) Omg, the nerve of these teenage boys to actually like me and show me around on my first day and try to ask me out. GAH.

7) "I couldn't allow him to have this level of influence over me. It was pathetic. More than pathetic, it was unhealthy." SING IT, BELLA--wait! No! Why are you not singing it anymore? Go back! Go back!

8) How many times is Edward described as being "angelic" or "godlike"? So many, many times.

9) Bella's "gratuitous drug use" is hilarious: UNNECESSARY COLD MEDICINE OH NOES. I know Stephenie Meyer is Mormon and has said there's a number of chemicals she doesn't approve of consuming (like caffeine, for example), but she lets Bella suck down, like, four Cokes at a restaurant, so I don't want to hear it about the Gratuitous NyQuil Abuse.

10) There's finally a character named Lauren--my real name--in a book I've actually read, and she's a nasal bitch. THANKS, STEPHENIE MEYER.

So basically, there's a lot of problems, and this isn't even getting into the writing itself. And my understanding is that the next two books are rather more rage-inducing in terms of the examples they set for young readers, but I can't speak to that yet. (Oh, by the way: for anyone who thinks that Twilight is "deeper" than Harry Potter, ask yourself if you'd be willing to read a book about nothing but Harry and Ginny's tortured love-angst, cutting out every single other plot point in the entire seven-book series.) However, it took me about four hours to power through the first, and I giggled through the whole thing, and man, did I need a four-hour giggle session right now. It's particularly rewarding now that we actually know that Robert Pattinson's playing Edward in the movie, because you can totally see him every time Bella mentions despairingly that Edward looks like he's fresh from a hair gel commercial or something. And apparently the rest of the movie is also filled with attractive people, so... I'm not saying I want to throw a vampire prom or anything, but I know what I'll be doing for my birthday when Twilight comes out just two days before.

ETA: Read a first half of Midnight Sun/large chunks of Twilight recap here; read more Twilight series recaps here.


Site Meter

Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
...smelling naturally of freesia...

OMG, srsly? Oy.

The more I hear about this book, the more I wonder if I did the right thing by giving a copy to my dad’s girlfriend’s teenaged daughter for Christmas.

"Just because I'm resisting the wine doesn't mean I can't appreciate the bouquet," he whispered. "You have a very floral smell, like lavender. . . or freesia," he noted. "It's mouthwatering."

Lawsy, you've totally convinced me to never read this book.

Sanity one, Stephenie Meyer zero!

My giggly book is Battlefield Earth, cause man, that graveside marriage is so over the top it's tear inducing.

Sadly, the movie isn't* so bad it's good, it's just unwatchably bad.

*fixed that.

Edited at 2008-05-14 07:57 pm (UTC)

Here from pottersues.

Battlefield Earth? I think having read that book makes you a Scilon1 by some accounts.

1. That's the Tom Cruise sort of Scilon, not the Tricia Helfer sort of Cylon. Less hot, more annoying, and significantly more Xenu-crazy.

Re: My thoughts on Twilight, in a nutshell

cleolinda

2008-05-14 07:59 pm (UTC)

Heh, I know, I posted a link yesterday.

i started it last night LOL. i got sucked into the ~dazzle~ and lulz of it all. i'd never even heard of it before. i found out what it was when i heard Robert Pattinson was in a new movie.

I think I first heard of it when Eclipse (the third book) hit the top of the bestseller list--it was the first book to crack #1 after Deathly Hallows.

I am so meta-quoting this:

"You're not a neglected orphan sleeping in a cupboard! You're a wizard! You're the bestest wizard of all and you're also great at sports and you had rich, wizardly parents who loved you so much they died for you (but you've still got their money) and also, we brought you birthday cake!"

With permission, of course. :)

Heeee. Thank you for this post. There's been a lot of talk about this book (and the series) over the past few months, but yours is the best perspective I've seen!

I didn't actually believe the thing about sparkly vampires until you quoted that passage. Wow. The hell?

Yeah, there were a ton of things I didn't believe until people quoted me chapter and verse. ("Sparkly? Freesia? BASEBALL?")

Yes, that is the essence of why I like Twilight. It is brain candy. It is mindless, useless, loveable fluff. Does your stuffed pony give real meaning to your life? No, but it's awesome. Same deal.

Also, the second and third books actually have a plot. And a love triangle!

This is the most intelligent and level-headed review I've read of this book yet. Thanks a lot for putting it out there.


My curiosity led me to something called "Kitty and the Midnight Hour". If Twilight is a Twinkie, then this is the literary version of the Hostess cupcake, complete with icing thick enough to peel off, and juicy, sweet filling.

It was such a bad/good series that I bought every single book and read all of them on my vacation. It's all about a midnight DJ that is also a werewolf (named Kitty). I lent the first book to a skeptical friend and he came back and grabbed every book I had.

If you want more junk food, I highly recommend it.

Aww, really? I liked the books because they had character development and killed "Werewolf+Werewolf Hunter= TRU LUV LIEK OMG" trope deader than dead. Which isn't to say that it isn't fluffy, but there is worse out there (like the later Kelley Armstrong books).

I think there's a good argument to be made for wish fulfillment to be made with Eowyn. Granted she's not the main character but I find her easier to identify with.

And now I want literary Twinkies. Where did you get the ebook?

Edward in the sunlight was shocking.

A vampire? In sunlight? Not turning to dust? Shocking indeed.

it seems, according to the movies and books these days, that vampires no long have to adhere to vampire "rules." They seem more like over-done goth kids, really. So daylight, entering homes without permission, and crossing bodies of water such as rivers are all acceptable no apparently.

They probably like garlic toast, too.

4) It's totes okay for a guy to stalk you and watch you while you sleep so long as he's hot.

Wait till you get to the third book. There, it's totes okay for your boyfriend to break your car to keep you from going to see someone he doesn't like. A good response to this? Is hitting him up for sex.

Yeah, I heard about that. That, and someone "imprinting" himself on a toddler. I was surprised when the first book was relatively unobjectionable compared to what I'd heard about the others.

"Oh, by the way: for anyone who thinks that Twilight is "deeper" than Harry Potter, ask yourself if you'd be willing to read a book about nothing but Harry and Ginny's tortured love-angst, cutting out every single other plot point in the entire seven-book series."

Oh God, that's ... a brilliant point. And so true. I don't understand why people insist on comparing the two series, because the focus in HP is so insanely different—not to mention Meyer's writing style makes JKR sound like high-quality literature.

Plus, JKR can't write romance for shit, and I think even she knows that. So she doesn't try—much. Except for those bits of HBP. Well, oddly enough, Bella/Edward actually makes HBP!Harry/Ginny sound... very reasonable and well-developed. And that is something I never thought I'd say. Straange.

I actually like H/G, but yeah--since that's one of the elements people complain so much about, imagine if it was nothing BUT that.

I think a lot of the comparison, though, is coming from 1) the Robert Pattinson angle and 2) the huge following angle. I mean, when the HP/LOTR movies were both coming out, there was some tension between the two fandoms, even though the only thing they really have in common is, like, wizards. And there's only, like, two wizards in LOTR as it is. People get defensive and territorial for some reason, I don't know.

Totally OT, but I'm so excited your name is also Lauren! It's so true, we don't get nearly enough cool fictional characters...sigh...

I have never read the books myself, since the wangsty fanmixes by middle school kids was enough to set off warning lights in my head..(also written in 1st person?? EW!) but I LOVE reading snark about them!! HEHEHE! XD

10) There's finally a character named Lauren--my real name--in a book I've actually read, and she's a nasal bitch. THANKS, STEPHENIE MEYER.

HEEEEE.

I was pointed to your LJ by anemonerose, as I just finished reading Twilight last night. Your assessment sounds like mine - wow, fluffy and sugary and totally brainless, but sometimes you just need that (I've got a cold :P) in which case - it's not a terrible story. If you want high literature, look elsewhere. And my negatives were about the same as yours, too.

I got sent a copy a few months back by a friend who raved about it, and how amazing it was and WOWYOUMUSTREADIT, and then I did and it was sort of like...candyfloss in paper form. With pointy teeth and Adonis wrapping.

I think I'll go see the film for gratuitous "it's so wrong to fancy him but so right", in a sort of naked Daniel Radcliffe kind of way.

One more and then I'll shut up:
Part of why I think the story OF Twilight is cool is because of who Stephenie Meyer is. She was a stay at home mom with four boys, and she had always wanted to write a book. So she did, and it got published, and it was a ROARING SUCCESS and now it's a movie deal. She never intended Twilight to be published- she literally wrote it because she wanted to, and someone just happened to show it someone, and word got around, it was printed, and then it EXPLODED. No, she is not the next JKR (when she writes a 700 page book with a plot that goes from start to finish, I'll start rethinking that, but I digress) but she's arguably the biggest sensation SINCE Harry Potter. Also- HP is over and done with. Sure, the movies aren't done yet, but we all know what happens. Star Wars is done. LOTR is done. His Dark Materials didn't take off like it should have. Narnia is sorta defunct because they waited too long between sequels. POTC is probably done, because Kiera doesn't want to make another one and there's only so long Johnny Depp and Orlando Bloom can prance around in pirate garb. Maybe we're just latching on because we WANT another mad sensation?

I think I need to finish my novel then. Because Twilight is pretty awful and if she can get published, damn it so can I.

This is a brilliant analysis. I have read the first three books and I felt a bit bad about liking them so much. I knew they weren't particularly well-written, the heroine wasn't especially likable, and I've read fanfics with far better plots, but I devoured them anyway (mostly due to the points you mentioned).

I think that Cedric will make a wonderful Edward, but something has got to be done about his hair. He's supposed to be perfect, and they've got him looking like Cameron Diaz in a sadly unforgettable scene from Something About Mary. Ick.

Awesome analysis. I wish these books had come out in 1998 because I know I would have eaten that cake up! Back in the day I was obsessed with the supernatural romance series Night World by L.J. Smith (who also wrote The Vampire Diaries - there were sexy vampire brothers who fought over the heroine lol). Night World is getting reissued soon, so I hope she gets a new generation of fans because those books kick Twilight's sparkly ass (or maybe that's just my nostalgia talking).

I read and adored The Vampire Diaries in fifth grade. I actually still own them-- they were my intro to sexyemovampire lit, and I love them like candy to this day. =)

Edward has lived with his parents for 300 years?

Damn. No wonder he's moody.

Technically, they're not his parents--I don't even know that they're old enough to be his parents--and he was born in 1901, so he's not quite that old. (His "father" is about 350 years old, though.) It's basically a group of unrelated people who pretend to be a foster family to escape notice. Because, you know, if I was an immortal, I'd want to make sure social services kept tabs on whether I went to school or not. FOR THE THIRTIETH TIME OVER.

Thank you for posting about this book. And I am ridiculously excited that you didn't hate them--I am seriously sick of having my friends-list filled with posts about how much Twilight sucks and is so terrible, when it really is just a cute peice of brain candy. Will I let my daughter read this when she's 15 and impressionable? No. Will I let my daughter read this when I think she can tell the difference between a fun read and reality? Absolutely.

OH and just wait until Jacob Black becomes a main character, and then you will stab yourself in the head with a spoon.

Welcome to the dark side. We have sparkling vampires? Ahaha, yes.

Also, agreed with every single point in this post.

"New Moon" lacks in hilarity though, so prepare yourself.

Nice analysis. Thank you.

scintillating arms HEE. I would never, ever have thought to use those two words together. Scintillating. Arms. It makes me snorfle.

Despite the ridiculousness of the book, you make great points (in fact, the things you've just written are probably more worthy writing than the book that inspired them, but whatever).

1) I remember back in high school having no clue what was going through some boys' heads (other boys were easier because I was friends with them and didn't have angst about them. It...didn't really occur to me that the boys I wondered about (i.e. crushes) were probably all as mundane as the ones I was friends with. Ah, high school). So yeah, I can see this. Looking back on some of my experiences, I think what may have attracted guys at that point (besides sexsexsex) would have been the gals who a) seemed to have it all together; and/or b) had strong personalities. Not, like, domineering personalities. More like, "not afraid to be who she is." But that's just remembering back on things I saw in high school which was ZOMG so long ago, so that may not be a great theory.

2) but you know he loves you because he's completely different around you. You are an exception to his very nature.

You are so wise, m'dear. That's exactly why girls like the bad boy (if he falls for them). (See also, 10 Things I Hate About You, which kind of has both main characters doing this. Aw, Heath Ledger. *sniff*)

3) Not only do you get to go into the crazy fun world with HP, but (if one is envisioning oneself as Harry) you also get to be a Reluctant Hero - someone who's doing the right thing and saving the world without being arrogant about it (mostly). I think that appeals a lot in regards to wish fulfillment, too; particularly in today's world, where we don't know the precise way to fix things (i.e. kill Voldemort). It would be nice to know you're doing the right thing and get out there and do it and, lo, make the world an instantaneously better place.

"Omg why does he hate me? Why does he not hate me now? Why does he hate me again? Does he like me? Does he not like me? Does he like me again? Omg I love him I love him I love him I love him I love him I love him he loves me!! And he sparkles!"

Hahaha. This is what teenage girls envision happening with their crushes (well, maybe except for the sparkle part) but it rarely does.

Edited at 2008-05-14 08:32 pm (UTC)

Despite the ridiculousness of the book, you make great points (in fact, the things you've just written are probably more worthy writing than the book that inspired them, but whatever).

Well... notice that, in the entire post, I never said that the books were actually good.

Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>